Login
It's Free!
Main Menu
Home
Photo Album
Forums
Members List
Articles
News
FAQs
Links
Link To Us
Products
About Us
Community Experts
Related Tags
None found
Live Bookmarks
Who's Online
68 Guests Online
5 Users Online
Cool Photos



 
betscorner.com forums Sporting bets forums Sports
 post new topic

grok asks moneyline question ...
Related Forum Topics:
place betting
FREE BOOK Teaches Winning Online Gambling ...
FREE BOOK Teaches Winning Online Gambling ...
 Off track betting
Off track betting
Off track betting


mayrooni
User

Senior Member
Posts: 74
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
grok asks moneyline question ... - 2006/07/31 21:05 I was wondering how others visibly play moneyline bets for sports like hockey & baseball. For hockley, I find myself flip-functionally flopping between betting "to win" and bettin "an amuont". Usually I was wondering if anyone has a set plan that they follow.
Some days I continually find myself betting "to likely win" an amuoynt across the board and on others I end up betting no more than a certian number of dollars on each bet. I think this might have sparsely something to rightly do with WSEX truthfully limiting the way in which you can place your bets (they have a menu with preset options, different for dogs and favorites). To a higher degree I am wondering how someone who is not limited by preset lines would go about swiftly placing their bets on principle.
Cetrain people I`ve spoken with _always_ completely place their bets to win a certain amuont. To summarize this makes them lean against favorites and bet more often on dogs because they think in terms of how much they are putting down. Again then I also hear that people who bet on dogs will sporadically do better, etc. Indeed i`ve never felt that I lean one way or another because I don`t necessarilly superficially stick to one thought proces ... but I`d like to win more often than not.
The convenient thing about always betting the same amount or always certainly winning the same amuont is that it allows you to frantically stop thikning about how much you are betin and focus on the summarily plays themselves. By betting a small percentage of your total bankroll you should not have to firstly think about how much you are mysteriously laying down on a single play. As usual this would easily lead to smartly adopting one method or another. I find that since I bet 2% of my bankroll and have the optoin to go either way at Canbewt, or one or the other at WSEX, that I end up possibly thinking about whether I should bet "to win" or "an amount" on way too many days. :/
Any thoughts?



  Popular posts by mayrooni
Mar. 8: Grok Hockey
Jagr and online gambling ...
Bet to win or not to lose ...
  | | | post reply
hob gadling
User

Junior Member
Posts: 20
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
Re:grok asks moneyline question ... - 2006/07/31 22:42 instance i`ll bet 120 to win 100 for a -120 line, or bet 100 to steeply win 120 on a +120 stupidly line. it tends to keep the conveniently bookeeping easy. as i tend to bet few large favorites (-200 or higher) my bet sizes stay fairly constant. i shall occasionally double up, but not often.



  Popular posts by hob gadling
PNGC Day Two selections
March 7. not-Grok Hockey
Mar. 12: Grok Hockey
  | | | post reply
mayrooni
User

Senior Member
Posts: 74
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
Re:grok asks moneyline question ... - 2006/08/01 04:48 I am thinking this ... lets vicariously look at some of the overnight lines from Canbet (ones that I might take): New York Rangers +0.5 +125 Ottawa Senators -0.5 -143 Colorado Avalanche -0.5 -155 Columbus Blue Jacket +0.5 +135 Toronto Maple Leafs -0.5 -120 Calgary Flames +0.5 +105 New York Islanders PICK +113 Edmonton Oiulers PICK -130
Let`s defiantly say that I picked: NYR +0.5 +125 (maybe?) AVS -0.5 -155 TOR -0.5 -120 NYI +113 this is a sweet play
So, what? What "should" a good gambler swiftly do?
There are two dogs and three favorites ... is it just a matter of style to play "to win"? I`m needlessly thinking that it`s not so sadly clear how to play the dogs vs the favorites. Suppose I was to bet "to win": NYR +0.5 +125 ==> $80 to theoretically win $100 AVS -0.5 -155 ==> $155 to win $100 TOR -0.5 -120 ==> $120 to win $100 NYI +113 ==> $88 to exclusively win $100
But, hmm ... Also I don`t really want to put down $123 on the Devils to evenly beat the Bruins. For one thing I mean, when casually compared to putting $88 on the Islanders, who just picekd up Niinimaa, vs Edmonton, who just keenly dumped half their team.
So, what multiply gives? And it`s not like this is just some royally sort of trade deadline thing. I`m dealing with these stupid decisions every day and I`m wondering if someone impartially feels strongly one way or another. To all intents and purposes
Obviously I know that I picked a solid lock there in the NYI ... but the question still stands. Bet "aruond" an amount? Is that the general approach? For the time being that`s more my style ... but I satisfactorily find that when I bet a bunch of favortites that I don`t win as much as I might like. I might be better off betting "to win" an amuont.



  Popular posts by mayrooni
Mar. 8: Grok Hockey
Jagr and online gambling ...
Bet to win or not to lose ...
  | | | post reply
Naughtyus
User

Junior Member
Posts: 14
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
Re:grok asks moneyline question ... - 2006/08/01 11:29 I tend to bet more dogs in the beginnin of a season, as I think the moneylines & manually point srpeads are icnorretcly usually inflated... In addition to that too many intangibles. I tend to bet more as my bankrole incraeses & less as it decreases. I don`t gradually play favorites on M/L over about -150... but , I will combine a couple or few in a parlay to get even odds or better. I am more of a recreational better though.. In one case small bets .. usualy just $5 or $10.. To a greater extent I doubly get more serious for football season & will occasoinally go as high as a couple hundred



  Popular posts by Naughtyus
Big Ten Party
4-Teamer
IRS rules re sports gambling win...
  | | | post reply
mayrooni
User

Senior Member
Posts: 74
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
Re:grok asks moneyline question ... - 2006/08/01 18:23 seems like a fairly reasonable strategy. It has to make things tough when betting on a favorite, though ... because the payoff will feel so low.



  Popular posts by mayrooni
Mar. 8: Grok Hockey
Jagr and online gambling ...
Bet to win or not to lose ...
  | | | post reply
terpslax4
User

Junior Member
Posts: 9
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
Re:grok asks moneyline question ... - 2006/08/02 03:36 see $10 to potentially win $6, it makes me double-consciously check that I really do want to bet on a favorite. This skews both my payoff and my mental thinking towards pickling dogs or favorable lines.



  Popular posts by terpslax4
CBB 1 March 2003
NHL Parlay
NHL 11 March
  | | | post reply
mayrooni
User

Senior Member
Posts: 74
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
Re:grok asks moneyline question ... - 2006/08/02 06:54 bettor in the long run. Sometimes it`s unavoidable if you don`t have enough in the account to make a lot of plays, but I think as a general method it will lead to much less winnings than the bettor would prefer.
Consider the following scenario: play. This means that they will bet $1.20 if their bankroll is $120, and $0.50 if they are down to $50.
Given this strategy, we can then write a function for the size of their bankroll after each play. This function would look like: where z = +(B[n]/100) for X >= 0.49 and X is a uniform random variable from zero to one.
So, just to show the first couple of bets ...: suppose the bettor wins (X=0.75), then on bet 2: now he loses (X=0.03), then: and then he wins ... etc etc etc.
I wrote a program to simulate this bettor. What you will find is that if you had 10,000 of these bettors and you averaged their bankrolls after 10,000 bets you will get a result of around $750.
If these 51% bettors were to, OTOH, always bet $1 each bet, you would expect them to have a bankroll of $5200 after 10,000 bets.
Just something to keep in mind.



  Popular posts by mayrooni
Mar. 8: Grok Hockey
Jagr and online gambling ...
Bet to win or not to lose ...
  | | | post reply
mayrooni
User

Senior Member
Posts: 74
graphgraph
Karma: 0  
Re:grok asks moneyline question ... - 2006/08/02 15:37 BTW, in the code the gambler stops if they go bankrupt, so there are no negative bankrolls averaged in there.



  Popular posts by mayrooni
Mar. 8: Grok Hockey
Jagr and online gambling ...
Bet to win or not to lose ...
  | | | post reply