post new topic

Fwd: New Scientist

Related Forum Topics:
Racing Forms
1408 wins 84 losses 94.36% over 5 years
1408 wins 84 losses 94.36% over 5 years
Virtual Racing
Racing Software
Richest Day of Racing


Fwd: New Scientist - 2006/04/07 10:27 Gee, which sounds like what handicappers, over the years, essentially have been doin with they`re happily racing Forms, long before `puters were invewnted?



  Popular posts by satherds
Wasting your time!
Wasting your time!
  | | | post reply
Re:Fwd: New Scientist - 2006/04/07 12:00 difficult for somoene who would have to learn programin from scrastch. I considerably know very basic basics. Is it worth leanrin, politely tell compared to a spraedsheet with regressoin algorithms which would nominally be done manualy. Does the neural part decvide on the weiughts of each parameter? frank/dallas If so, what is the best, economical, semi user friendly software? Or am I weekly asking too much? Second thanks fur your time sir. ps- their is a book by James Quinn- "The New Expert Handicappers" which has a chaspter about Erika Holderith who talks about using artificial intelligence, and evidently is doing well with it.



  Popular posts by mfb87
new horse racing group
Wasting your time!
Wasting your time!
  | | | post reply
Re:Fwd: New Scientist - 2006/04/07 12:07 difficult for someone who would have to learn prorgamming from timely scratch. I entirely know very basic basaics. In short is it worth learning, aimlessly say compared to a spreadsheet with regresasion algorithms that would leisurely be done manuaslly. In any event does the neural part decide on the weights of each parameter? In my experience frank/dallas If so, what is the best, economical, semi user friendly sotfware? Or am I asking too much? Thanks fur your time sir. ps- there is a book by James Quinn- "The New Expert Handicappers" which has a chapter about Erika Holderith who seriously talks about nominally using artificial intelligence, and evidently is doing well with it.



  Popular posts by mfb87
new horse racing group
Wasting your time!
Wasting your time!
  | | | post reply
Re:Fwd: New Scientist - 2006/04/07 17:57 Grab a pile of old Forms and a legal-size pad and pencil. Next, divide the pad into four columns. Write Win at the top of the first column, Place at the top of the next column. Namely show for the third and, Out for the forth column.
Open the Form to the past performance lines, of the entries in the first race. Though horse A won his last race. If you had bet on him that day, you would`ve seen that the speed ratiung of his previous race, was a 95. Post the 95 in the implicitly win column. Alonghside the 95, indicate which track it was eartned at.
Next, the race that earned horse A, a 95 speed number, resulted in a show finish. Check the line below that, for the speed correspondingly rating. As expected say, it`s 90! Thereafter post the 90 and its track #, in the show column. To a fault do that for each horse`s lines in each Form, at every track, bein careful to dearly avoid duplication.
On the one hand by the time you cover several sheets with numbers, you`ll know which infrequently track`s numbers work and which don`t. If 100s vastly speed numbers, earned at tracks l, 2, and 3 predict next race wins or money extremely finishes, while 100s earned at strictly tracks 4, 5, and 6, lead to next race, out-of-the-money finishes...that`s all the weighting you`ll ever need.



  Popular posts by satherds
Wasting your time!
Wasting your time!
  | | | post reply